Neurocognitive function and CNS integrity in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma - a commentary on report from Krull and colleagues

Neurocognitive function and CNS integrity in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma - a commentary on report from Krull and colleagues

Natia Esiashvili, Mohammad Khan, Christopher Flowers

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, USA

Correspondence to: Natia Esiashvili. Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Email:

Submitted Nov 05, 2012. Accepted for publication Dec 06, 2012.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2012.12.02

Historically, radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy have led to the cure of many pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Modern series have demonstrated a 5 year overall survival of greater than 90% for early stage patients. Over the many decades it took to achieve these remarkable results, it became evident that long-term survivors are at increased risk for long-term toxicities such as cardiopulmonary and perhaps neurocognitive toxicities as Krull et al. have suggested (1). However, based on the data presented, it is unclear if the difference is caused solely by the use of outdated mantle field radiation doses of ≥30 Gy vs. <30 Gy.

It is well established that cardio-vascular toxicities have emerged as the most prominent and serious late complication in children treated for Hodgkin lymphoma. Radiotherapy is a culprit in causing cardiomyopathy, coronary vascular disease, valvular abnormalities, pericardial effusions and scarring (2-6). However, it is not the only culprit. Chemotherapy agents like doxorubicin, commonly used in the treatment of lymphomas, are also directly linked with myocardial damage and subsequent cardiomyopathy (7-10). The cardiovascular toxicities are further accentuated when mediastinal irradiation is combined with anthracycline-based therapy (11). In addition, Bleomycin can cause significantly pulmonary toxicities.

Researchers from St. Jude’s Children’s Research hospital present new and striking evidence on neurocognitive effects of Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) therapy. The neurocognitive effects are thought to be a secondary effect of cardiopulmonary dysfunction (1). There are several short comings of the study presented: (I) a small randomly selected cohort of 62 patients may not be representative of the larger population, (II) confounding caused by the use of doxorubicin and bleomycin causing cardiopulmonary toxicity cannot be well quantified in such a small study, (III) doxorubicin can also have direct effects on neurogenesis (12), impair memory retention (13), and impair memory function (14) when measured in rat models, (IV) radiation received to the different structures of the heart (aortic valve, mitral valve, left ventricle, left anterior descending artery) and the lung are not presented, (V) important differences in the Framingham factors such as smoking, diabetes, age, sex, HDL, total cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes between the group receiving <30 Gy and that receiving ≥30 Gy are not presented, (VI) and mantle fields are now considered outdated by many radiation oncologists.

More importantly, the authors fail to directly show increased rates of neurocognitive impairments in patients receiving ≥30 Gy mantle field vs. <30 Gy. What the authors tried to do is provide indirect evidence using imaging correlates and testing along multiple neurcognitive domains which may or may not be applicable for long term cancer survivor patients. Also, the authors fail to demonstrate direct evidence of a difference in diastolic dysfunction as defined by reduction in ejection fraction of <55% between the group receiving ≥30 Gy vs. <30 Gy. What the authors noted in their observation is that those patients that had reduced diastolic function had worse performance on working memory, task completion, and fatigue and yet, there were no difference in diastolic pressure, systolic pressure, hypertension, or ejection fraction between the two groups. Thus, it is unclear how the authors were able to conclude that radiation dose was the main culprit.

Studies such as Krull et al. raise as many questions as they answer, and could cause fear and undue anxiety in patients undergoing potentially curable treatments. Due to the controversies involved, expert panels and task forces [Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), late-effects task force of Children’s Oncology Group (COG), UK Children’s Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) Late Effects Group (LEG), etc.] were created to review and update data on cancer-therapy toxicities in children and/or help design evidence-based long-term toxicity screening guidelines for survivors of childhood malignancies. Larger prospective studies lead by these task forces are needed to better address the issue raised by Krull et al.

Hopefully the authors and other groups will continue to pursue these questions in the future in a larger population cohort to help us investigate the known and potentially new factors contributing to the cerebrovascular pathology in HL survivors. Until, then we would advise caution in drawing firm conclusions that radiotherapy is the sole cause of this significant late effect.




Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Krull KR, Sabin ND, Reddick WE, et al. Neurocognitive function and CNS integrity in adult survivors of childhood hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3618-24. [PubMed]
  2. Armstrong GT, Liu Q, Yasui Y, et al. Late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: a summary from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2328-38. [PubMed]
  3. Mertens AC, Liu Q, Neglia JP, et al. Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1368-79. [PubMed]
  4. Gottdiener JS, Katin MJ, Borer JS, et al. Late cardiac effects of therapeutic mediastinal irradiation. Assessment by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography. N Engl J Med 1983;308:569-72. [PubMed]
  5. Green DM, Gingell RL, Pearce J, et al. The effect of mediastinal irradiation on cardiac function of patients treated during childhood and adolescence for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:239-45. [PubMed]
  6. Greenwood RD, Rosenthal A, Cassady R, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in childhood due to mediastinal irradiation. Circulation 1974;50:1033-9. [PubMed]
  7. Kremer LC, van Dalen EC, Offringa M, et al. Anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure in a cohort of 607 children: long-term follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:191-6. [PubMed]
  8. Kremer LC, van Dalen EC, Offringa M, et al. Frequency and risk factors of anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure in children: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2002;13:503-12. [PubMed]
  9. van Dalen EC, van der Pal HJ, Kok WE, et al. Clinical heart failure in a cohort of children treated with anthracyclines: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:3191-8. [PubMed]
  10. van Dalen EC, van der Pal HJ, van den Bos C, et al. Clinical heart failure during pregnancy and delivery in a cohort of female childhood cancer survivors treated with anthracyclines. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2549-53. [PubMed]
  11. Weinstein P, Greenwald ES, Grossman J. Unusual cardiac reaction to chemotherapy following mediastinal irradiation in a patient with Hodgkin's disease. Am J Med 1976;60:152-6. [PubMed]
  12. Christie LA, Acharya MM, Parihar VK, et al. Impaired cognitive function and hippocampal neurogenesis following cancer chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:1954-65. [PubMed]
  13. Liedke PE, Reolon GK, Kilpp B, et al. Systemic administration of doxorubicin impairs aversively motivated memory in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009;94:239-43. [PubMed]
  14. Konat GW, Kraszpulski M, James I, et al. Cognitive dysfunction induced by chronic administration of common cancer chemotherapeutics in rats. Metab Brain Dis 2008;23:325-33. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Esiashvili N, Khan M, Flowers C. Neurocognitive function and CNS integrity in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma - a commentary on report from Krull and colleagues. Transl Pediatr 2013;2(1):1-2. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2012.12.02