Intestinal anastomosis in children: it’s time for a general consensus
Letter to the Editor

Intestinal anastomosis in children: it’s time for a general consensus

Alessandro Boscarelli

Paediatric Surgery Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, RM, Italy

Correspondence to: Alessandro Boscarelli, MD. Pediatric Surgery Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy. Email: tboscar@hotmail.it.

Submitted Jul 03, 2016. Accepted for publication Jul 09, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/tp.2016.08.02


Dear Editor,

The search for most appropriate suture materials and suturing techniques is still a controversial aspect (1), both in general and pediatric surgery. Suture materials and suturing techniques for intestinal anastomosis are various. Suture materials can be of different type such as natural or synthetic, monofilament or multifilament, absorbable or non-absorbable. Suturing techniques are also assorted and can be hand-sewn or mechanical. Originally, intestinal anastomosis was exclusively hand-sewn and they were executed with a single layer, interrupted, absorbable suture (Vicryl) (2). In 1993, Martin and Motbey found that Maxon suture, a monofilament absorbable stitch, was superior to other available sutures for paediatric gastrointestinal surgery (3). Moreover, since early 80s, intestinal anastomosis began to be performed also mechanically (stapled intestinal anastomosis), with similar results among surgeons worldwide (4-6). With the advent of minimally invasive surgery new techniques have been reported. In 2001, Bax et al. described successfully the first case of laparoscopic diamond-shaped anastomosis of the bowel with an interrupted 5/0 Vicryl suture in a newborn baby (7). Recently, two stimulating studies regarding intestinal anastomosis have been published. Ross et al. concluded that extramucosal (seromuscular), single layer anastomosis performed with interrupted, non-absorbable monofilament (polypropylene) is an appropriate alternative technique to perform end-to-end anastomosis in infancy and childhood in both elective and emergency operations (8). Meanwhile, Gurien et al. found that continuous running suture for bowel anastomosis in young, growing animal model is feasible and do not lead to strictures or impaired growth when compared with simple interrupted technique (9).

In this evolving debate, surgeons continue to use the suture material and suturing technique considered more suitable according to their own experience. Nowadays, there is not a general consensus among surgeons about which suture material and suturing technique should be preferred. Therefore, a general consensus about most appropriate suture material and suturing technique for each situation, not only for intestinal anastomosis, is desirable. This would ensure to surgical patients a high standard care everywhere and, furthermore, a specific preparation for all residents in pediatric surgery of today and tomorrow.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012.CD003144. [PubMed]
  2. McDonald CC, Baird RL. Vicryl intestinal anastomosis. Analysis of 327 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:775-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Martin HC, Motbey J. Use of polyglyconate suture in paediatric gastrointestinal anastomosis. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:883-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Mattioli G, Castagnetti M, Gandullia P, et al. Stapled restorative proctocolectomy in children with refractory ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1773-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Mitchell IC, Barber R, Fischer AC, et al. Experience performing 64 consecutive stapled intestinal anastomoses in small children and infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:128-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Sato K, Uchida H, Tanaka Y, et al. Stapled intestinal anastomosis is a simple and reliable method for management of intestinal caliber discrepancy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2012;28:893-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Bax NM, Ure BM, van der Zee DC, et al. Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy for duodenal atresia. Surg Endosc 2001;15:217. [PubMed]
  8. Ross AR, Hall NJ, Ahmed SA, et al. The extramucosal interrupted end-to-end intestinal anastomosis in infants and children; a single surgeon 21year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:1131-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Gurien LA, Wyrick DL, Smith SD, et al. A stitch in time saves nine: suture technique does not affect intestinal growth in a young, growing animal model. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:819-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Boscarelli A. Intestinal anastomosis in children: it’s time for a general consensus. Transl Pediatr 2017;6(1):76-77. doi: 10.21037/tp.2016.08.02